Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 11:24:53 -0700 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, re <re@freebsd.org>, svn-src-stable-11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... Message-ID: <2526702.9M648BMneK@ralph.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2DL3Acp6DanoZBZm57XWhiujtM0os9Yau6spe%2Bhdzn8Gg@mail.gmail.com> References: <201803311138.w2VBcKHP014025@repo.freebsd.org> <20180331184109.GA23589@lonesome.com> <CAPyFy2DL3Acp6DanoZBZm57XWhiujtM0os9Yau6spe%2Bhdzn8Gg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday, April 02, 2018 12:27:47 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On 31 March 2018 at 14:41, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> wrote: > This is the most important point of this discussion: we do need to > ensure there's good communication and coordination between teams where > dependencies like this exist. I'll take the blame here: Dimitry asked > me about merging the Clang update to stable/11 and I agreed that it > was reasonable to merge sooner rather than later to have as much lead > time as possible before the 11.2 process starts. I also assumed that > outstanding Clang 6 issues in ports were farther along in being > addressed. > > The key lesson from this discussion is that for significant commits > and merges like this one we should make sure to always have sufficient > advance notice. Is this driven by -mretpoline? That is, would we not be as aggressive with pushing for clang 6 in 11.2 if it weren't for that? I kind of feel like we probably wouldn't and would have left it at 5 and let clang 6 be a FreeBSD 12 thing. Was -mretpoline backported to clang 5 (I thought there was some talk of providing patches for clang 5)? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2526702.9M648BMneK>