From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Dec 10 23:56:40 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B1B1336CE9 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byuu@tutanota.com) Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tutanota.de", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AF9B74728; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byuu@tutanota.com) Received: from w2.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.163]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1C1FBF16F; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:49:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tutanota.com; s=20161216; t=1544485789; bh=VUs/P9Ey7HL/rS+v/lqqfAmwl+k4zm03Q2b/+lWZ4DE=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=LApoqBkDY8UvK4U/sxcz2AQWmhNdQyKjxxQT8whnjao/u9oKXWpo+fE6MrUGNJQRc fjt7gfer5utiWJH5kW0eWvqYleA0YfhWHAGbgCPWWsseD7Mg4tMJYd4Gxo1KQHGX2g GAU4jNg7vyHuA37Mfp9uS3JTaKPydX7H1dWgfsI9G1v8XQu1v62UrZL4KYQ5PgJYqM fenO44umYHp2R0A1WUREC4i8dnWuwvmXMTi0cx/g/IkUiOJUM8Uq24QNDKs/hbm/DL P6nT9CJ6JrkdZNgtTPFZ9xw+vjOjUzeVO5a1V7jdND3UB6PgF3nFmCswtWvC1PEvlD qRVbUNxS84nKQ== Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 00:49:49 +0100 (CET) From: To: Conrad Meyer , Freebsd Hackers Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <> <> Subject: Re: I'd like to submit a kernel patch for a new sysctl to use EFI instead of ACPI for poweroff + reboot MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0AF9B74728 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.30 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip4:81.3.6.160/28]; URIBL_RED(3.50)[freenas.org.multi.uribl.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tutanota.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[tutanota.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mail.tutanota.de]; HAS_ANON_DOMAIN(0.50)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[162.6.3.81.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24679, ipnet:81.3.0.0/18, country:DE]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[tutanota.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.52)[0.518,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.965,0]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.93)[0.933,0]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 23:56:40 -0000 Sorry, I meant to say, "Are you using a Threadripper 2 as well?", of course= it's a TR4 socket board ... sigh. Dec 11, 2018, 8:47 AM by byuu@tutanota.com: > I made an account on reviews.freebsd.org, but it won't allow me to submit= a patch via the website. > > Tutorials online want me to install a bunch of software, install certific= ates, configure Git, and ... I'm very sorry, but I don't have the patience = just for a quick patch. No hard feelings if you can't use it like this. > > As far as the bug not occurring on your X399 ... very interesting. Are yo= u using a Threadripper as well? This user was having the same issue on the = X399 as I am on my X399M: > https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/am= d-threadripper-build.70194/#post-485064 > > I've exhausted all latest version BIOS settings, toggled lots of sysctl t= unables, etc to no avail. Not a big deal really, just had nothing better to= work on while waiting for 12-RELEASE ^-^; > > Dec 11, 2018, 6:31 AM by > cem@freebsd.org > : > >> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:06 AM <>> byuu@tutanota.com >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> Thank you, this information helped a lot! >>> >> >> I am glad to hear it. >> >>> I am not sure where I should submit my patch to ... I'll post it here i= f that's okay. If it needs to go somewhere else, please provide instruction= s or if you don't mind ... submit it on my behalf ^^; >>> >> >> I'll second Jason's request =E2=80=94 please go ahead and submit a diff = to >> Phabricator (reviews.freebsd.org), if you don't mind. >> >>> This patch has been created against -CURRENT, and has been tested succe= ssfully on 12.0-RC3. It allows me to power off my ASRock X399M (mATX) mothe= rboard, and should also work for ASRock X399 (ATX) users who have reported = the same problem of ACPI hanging during shutdown. Hopefully it will be usef= ul to other users in the future who experience ACPI shutdown issues as a fa= llback option. >>> >> >> Hm, I don't recall my ASRock X399 board having issues shutting down with= ACPI. >> >> Thanks, >> Conrad >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org >> mail= ing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to ">> freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org >> " >> > >