From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Oct 20 14:48:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FF537B403 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 14:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 47D8F14C2E; Sat, 20 Oct 2001 23:48:41 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Arun Sharma Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: truss vs ktrace References: <3BCCCF74.75B7F36C@disney.com> <20011020182451.EC4E95E594@sharmas.dhs.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 20 Oct 2001 23:48:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20011020182451.EC4E95E594@sharmas.dhs.org> Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Arun Sharma writes: > Another advantage of truss is that the output is "online" and interactive. > ktrace requires you to use kdump to view the trace. I certainly wouldn't call truss "interactive". As for "online", see the -l command-line option to kdump. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message