Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 03:20:30 -0400 From: Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com> To: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>, Paul Procacci <pprocacci@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FBSD 15 :: if_bridge help needed Message-ID: <CAFbbPuiX=uzsrH8u=2%2B0=dEmPU1cg7SX5AwYz=hXM=4KPCrE_A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <aOYOvGARWUkFwpQu@amaryllis.le-fay.org> References: <CAFbbPuiq1bZEMdsGvk=asfn8efszrb6pofa%2B4o86x=E4cLpdng@mail.gmail.com> <F13F0E41-39D5-48BA-A615-354C5A4B9D52@punkt.de> <aOYOvGARWUkFwpQu@amaryllis.le-fay.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 8, 2025 at 3:12 AM Lexi Winter <ivy@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Patrick M. Hausen wrote in <F13F0E41-39D5-48BA-A615-354C5A4B9D52@punkt.de>:
> > I am not sure how far the support of tagged frames crossing a
> > bridge interface has come today.
>
Patrick, I concur with what you said and it's what I was doing for years' past.
If need be I'll revert but I was kinda giddy to try the new code.
> this should work fine, bridge(4) in 15.0 is capable of adding and
> removing VLAN tags as required.
>
> i did not have a chance to try to reproduce OP's problem yet, since i am
> very busy with 15.0 release issues, but i will try to do so in the next
> day or so.
I have some debugging information that I just acquired if it helps.
I have determined that the bridge isn't receiving arp requests that
are being sent by Jail 1; the machine with the trunk
I have also determined that the bridge *is* receiving arp requests
from Jail 2; the machine that is labeled as 'access' or untagged.
The only difference between the two here is that in my scenario, Jail
1 does it's own tagging while Jail 2 doesn't and leans on the bridge
for its `access'.
Thanks Gents!
Paul Procacci
--
__________________
:(){ :|:& };:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFbbPuiX=uzsrH8u=2%2B0=dEmPU1cg7SX5AwYz=hXM=4KPCrE_A>