Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 06:48:31 -0800 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: "Brian T.Schellenberger" <bts@babbleon.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, BOUWSMA Beery <freebsd-user@netscum.dyndns.dk>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Performance of FreeBSD vs NetBSD (was: Re: Performance of -current vs -stable) Message-ID: <20020311064831.A42820@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20020311142926.3079BBA05@i8k.babbleon.org> References: <200203102005.g2AK5SN99334@beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk> <20020311132340.105D6BA05@i8k.babbleon.org> <20020311055415.A17397@xor.obsecurity.org> <20020311142926.3079BBA05@i8k.babbleon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As I already asked: what compile time options were used in the two cases ? They surely can make a huge difference. cheers luigi On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 09:29:25AM -0500, Brian T.Schellenberger wrote: > Though the *system* time and *interrupt* time seem to track as one might > expect for this issue, there still seems to be something *else* going on per > the mpg123 time and idle time. > > Ref: > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=13691+0+current/freebsd-hackers > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020311064831.A42820>