From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 19:18:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187C216A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:18:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (av3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C358643D64; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:18:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com) Received: by av3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id ED60F37E67; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:18:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net [81.228.11.163]) by av3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE0737E5F; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:18:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from gadget (h130n1fls11o822.telia.com [213.64.66.130]) by smtp3-1-sn1.fre.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C142E37E4A; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:18:35 +0200 (CEST) From: "Daniel Eriksson" To: "'Lukas Ertl'" Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 21:17:43 +0200 Organization: Home Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <20040725203633.M601@korben.in.tern> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: cvs commit: src/sys/geom/vinum geom_vinum.c geom_vinum_drive.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:18:37 -0000 Lukas Ertl wrote: > > This made geom_vinum work on my system, at least partially.=20 > What is the > > correct way of starting geom_vinum? I tried adding=20 > geom_vinum_load=3D"YES" in > > loader.conf, but that made the machine panic during disc probing. >=20 > Where does it panic? Do you have a backtrace? No, no backtrace available because after an upgrade of the system to 2004.07.27.11.00.00 (earlier today) the panic is gone. I might have found another slight problem though, but I'm not sure if = it's a fluke or if it's repeatable. I'll let you know next time I take the = server offline. The problem was that some if the gvinum filesystems (all the striped filesystems, but not the mirrored) did not properly clear the = dirty flag on shutdown. Again, I don't know if this is a real problem. I'll = report back here if it is. /Daniel Eriksson