From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:26:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A933489 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F075B9D4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id rl12so23329643iec.12 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:26:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D7GlJVETF/3yGXHkER7EmdD2WFNikdpc11kOsvCyWYs=; b=S5/ifzzCQtiqqyJ/D0LXtdFNxWUCyEXdE/WI1R25sQurfC/IAweWGh6TuGXEOvEIBk EVurIYWaHNi9wKkl4JUuYKNLMhKoTdX8wVxKldkmQC72UR77jrAikWbTDN6ob1F7tBA1 TDV/tUwEcB2Okr3B2ywsWqemPG133EhM8zLA8DuGCzEKGdwDWoYD9kx3MVxyfX3rKj3x domXnkSVGUeln/rkJtQt9jjgnGhCkIDGFuri0CMTTwE1yVKxBskxq6/biZr21nkuUvEr xjndZtJHjdf+TT4BkUP8hpGXYLkGlUnEa5amcho/4u0WxppX+CX3pbiEajgnZ5C4XJdU kQTg== X-Received: by 10.42.107.83 with SMTP id c19mr21725921icp.48.1421033189459; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:26:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2601:7:6c80:6f00::a767]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u31sm7834720ioi.33.2015.01.11.19.26.28 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 11 Jan 2015 19:26:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54B33ED9.9090502@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 20:26:17 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SILICONE TUBING, BRAIDED HOSES, GASKETS,SHEETS References: <47145.69.209.239.168.1420939332.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <20150112110955.7f55a0a1@X220.alogt.com> <54B33CAB.6070608@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <54B33CAB.6070608@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 03:26:30 -0000 On 01/11/2015 08:16 PM, Jon Radel wrote: > On 1/11/15 10:09 PM, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 19:22:12 -0600 (CST) >> "Valeri Galtsev" wrote: >> >>> On Sat, January 10, 2015 6:40 pm, Chris Hill wrote: >>>> Any of us who are homebrewers might well be interested in food-grade >>>> autoclavable tubing. >>>> >>> And I was suggesting to reject from domain... Forget it, there is no >>> way to please everybody if spam lovers are in the mix... >>> >> did you notice that the same spam also came from >> himsanpolymer@gmail.com? >> >> Should I go through my spam to find out more of those addresses? >> > I recognize the irony of this email so will do this only once this year: > > I personally find the endless discussions about spam vastly more > tedious than the actual spam, of which there is relatively little. If > nothing else, the discussion is more likely to look to my spam filter > as if it might have some worthwhile content. > > Happy New Year! > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > All I wish to add to all this noise is this: I send an email to the provider of the email address the message came from and to the host hosting the domain and a cc the DHS about this abuse.