Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 07:28:21 +1000 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: davidg@Root.COM, nc@ai.net Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router Message-ID: <199506242128.HAA01653@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Second question, and related. Even if an software based router has to
>wait for an entire packet frame to come in before routing it, that
>strikes me only as a latency problem, and not a thruput problem,
>especially on cards that can multitask and have builtin buffers [32k in
>the SMC 100mbps I believe] Couldn't the driver be written to grab the
This seems rather small. 4K buffers cause problems at 10Mbps so I
suppose 40K would cause problems at 100Mbps.
>entire contents of the buffer and route them all the packets at once? I
>can't imagine that a 486 or a Pentium is slower in horsepower than a
>Cisco box, even though a cisco may be able to turn them around faster.
>Actually, if memory serves, the clock interrupt hits many times a second.
>In BSD I think rtc0 is about 100 times per second. With a 32k buffer
clk0
>polled once per tick, you are getting MUCH higher thruput than
>100megabits assuming you are on a PCI bus [scratch the 486 in that
Much lower. 32K * 100 * 8 is only 24Mbps. 100Mbps is a lot.
Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506242128.HAA01653>