Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Feb 1998 15:22:20 -0800 (PST)
From:      Tom <tom@sdf.com>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com>
Cc:        Wee Teck Ng <weeteck@eecs.umich.edu>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: very slow scsi performance 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980218152053.20019C-100000@misery.sdf.com>
In-Reply-To: <199802182318.QAA01242@pluto.plutotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:

> The problems that have been reported against many IBM drives stem from
> the fact that the DQUE bit is set on many OEM models.  The current SCSI
...
> drives are behaving completely within the bounds of the SCSI spec.  CAM
> handles this "problem" by honoring the DQUE bit assuming that the user
> knows what they are doing.

  Wait a second... that means that those drives don't support tags at all?
Now I'm sure that I don't want IBM drives.

Tom


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980218152053.20019C-100000>