From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 24 21:20:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08EFE16A428; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:20:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5597543D9C; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 681A02087; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:20:02 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D872083; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:20:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 38D1133C8D; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:20:02 +0100 (CET) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: babkin@users.sf.net References: <16124661.1463151143229691692.JavaMail.root@vms076.mailsrvcs.net> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:20:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <16124661.1463151143229691692.JavaMail.root@vms076.mailsrvcs.net> (Sergey Babkin's message of "Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:48:11 -0600 (CST)") Message-ID: <86bqvvpmke.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Luigi Rizzo , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, John Baldwin , cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: email mangling (Re: cvs commit: src/bin/ls cmp.c extern.h ls.1 ls.c ls.h pri X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 21:20:21 -0000 Sergey Babkin writes: > How about replacing the dot with another character? Like, > someone@here.com would become someone@here*com. The harvesters > would likely catch up to it as well but it would take them some > time. Or for a little more confusion add a fake suffix or prefix > seperated by a dot, like: someone@here*com.com or > someone@xxx.here*com. Look, mangling email addresses to protect against spammers is about as effective and reliable as the good old "I'll pull out early, I promise" contraceptive method. Can everybody please grow up, accept the hard facts of life, and install a spam filter? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no