From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 26 17:00:09 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A87B65D
 for <office@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75358312
 for <office@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t4QH09HG069316
 for <office@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: office@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 200236] [maintainer][patch] games/wesnoth: fix for some FreeBSD
 10.1 builds
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: amdmi3@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-200236-25061-oibaqdjBXR@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-200236-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-200236-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD <freebsd-office.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-office/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-office@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-office>,
 <mailto:freebsd-office-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 17:00:09 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200236

--- Comment #24 from Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #20)

You just forget about all combinations of CC=/CXX=, compilers from base system
and ports and updates of these, current and stable branches, "ports compiler"
we had in plans afaik, freebsd and dragonfly differences etc. Compiler version
is always objective. Release versions have nothing to do with this at all.

> That was unnecessarily complex for academic releases.  Let's be practical.

Being practical, OPSYS/OSVERSION checks are _always_ more complex and less
correct than compiler check.


> I do not believe this is not a boost issue.

It really is a boost issue, see comment #1. You won't catch this with
poudriere.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.