From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 12:44:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B14337B404; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:44:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F35643FCB; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89E0172FDC; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8894B72FD1; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:44:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: "I-Humphrey, Brendon" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030610124346.S39830@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Re: Twin CPU machine running with only one cpu? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 19:44:19 -0000 On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, I-Humphrey, Brendon wrote: > What I am wondering, if subsequent changes to the machdep code have > altered the behaviour in such a way that the OS is now picking up the > first physical CPU and its HTT core, and ignoring the others. That would > account for the weird load/scheduling behaviour. Well taht would be downright wierd :) can you dump the contents of 'mptable'? What chipset is that supermicro board? broadcom? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org