Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 23:34:04 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst <ben@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Costello <chris@calldei.com> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter da Silva <peter@baileynm.com> Subject: Re: Proposed Utility - detach(1) Message-ID: <20010824233404.I33784@strontium.shef.vinosystems.com> In-Reply-To: <20010824171548.A60451@holly.calldei.com> References: <20010824141955.B64018@coffee.q9media.com> <20010824171548.A60451@holly.calldei.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Chris Costello wrote:
> On Friday, August 24, 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote:
>> I would appreciate comments on the usefulness of a utility which would
>> allow one to detach a process from a TTY. I imagine the utility would
>> be very small and just call daemon(3) and execlp(3).
>>=20
>> Would a utility like this be useful? Is this functionality already
>> available in a system utility?
>=20
> All shells implement this:
>=20
> sh:
> $ sleep 5 &
> $=20
> [1] 61049 Exit 0 sleep 5
Err... putting a process in the background is quite different to
detaching it from the terminal. Or did I miss your point?
--=20
Ben Smithurst / ben@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power To Serve
http://www.FreeBSD.org/
--/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7htZbbPzJ+yzvRCwRAsyuAKCundWI6mI89sdGYvqBUPz25hcx4ACg0Qv+
AkTsDCEfUPJ1ldnqhHX8Fg8=
=Y9MU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/Zw+/jwnNHcBRYYu--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010824233404.I33784>