From owner-freebsd-fs Wed Nov 29 19: 3:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C14337B400 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:03:51 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eAU323307887; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:02:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 19:02:03 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: fs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Block vs. frag sizes in newfs Message-ID: <20001129190203.T8051@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 08:42:56AM +0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Alexey Dokuchaev [001129 18:43] wrote: > Hello! > > Sorry for x-posting: I've heard somewhere that not too many ppl actually > read fs... > > AFAIR, there was a conversation going on concerning ${SUBJ}. I remember > some thougths that -b = -f is sort of optimum, things like that... > Or, why 8192/1024 are installation defaults?.. > > What it the truth behind all this? I'm intereted in any opinion. Sour grapes from people whos fs can't deal with frags. :) Yes, people read fs@, no need to cross post. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message