From owner-cvs-all Wed Sep 16 10:38:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA23455 for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:38:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23447 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:38:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21339; Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:35:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Wayne Scott cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Time to look at those pesky PRs ! In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 16 Sep 1998 09:35:00 PDT." <199809161635.JAA27002@pdxlx008.pdx.intel.com> Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1998 10:35:38 -0700 Message-ID: <21335.905967338@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I submitted a PR to fix a bug in popen. (misc/7810) My inital fix was > incorrect, but in a followup I quoted how POSIX say popen() should > behave and provided a 3 line patch that fixes the bug. (I believe.) I see a 4 line fix in the PR. Is that the good one or the bad one? :-) - Jordan