From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 10 23:40:12 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA07080 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 23:40:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Guard.PolyNet.Lviv.UA (Guard.PolyNet.Lviv.UA [194.44.138.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA06931 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 1999 23:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pam@polynet.lviv.ua) From: pam@polynet.lviv.ua Received: (qmail 1759 invoked by alias); 11 Feb 1999 07:38:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 1753 invoked from network); 11 Feb 1999 07:38:31 -0000 Received: from postoffice.polynet.lviv.ua (194.44.138.1) by guard.polynet.lviv.ua with SMTP; 11 Feb 1999 07:38:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 25615 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Feb 1999 07:38:31 -0000 Date: 11 Feb 1999 09:38:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 09:38:31 +0200 (EET) X-Sender: pam@NetSurfer.lp.lviv.ua To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Bandwidth limiting/trafic shaping Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello everybody! Can someone comment about comparison of bandwidth limiting software like dummynet or bwmgr from ET inc. and alternative queuing schemes like ALQ with Class Based Queuing (CBQ)? All seem to provide similar effects but which is preferable in what situation? If I'll get enough feedback I'll post summary. Thanks in advance, Adrian Pavlykevych email: System Administrator phone/fax: +380 (322) 742041 State University "Lvivska Polytechnica" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message