From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 30 07:22:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A05A106566B; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:22:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEAD08FC14; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n3U7JBVw004495; Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:19:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:19:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20090430.011913.-1023162474.imp@bsdimp.com> To: stas@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20090430110739.682cc989.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <200904300124.n3U1Or1w097927@svn.freebsd.org> <20090430162311.T2904@delplex.bde.org> <20090430110739.682cc989.stas@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, brde@optusnet.com.au Subject: Re: svn commit: r191677 - head/usr.bin/du X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:22:14 -0000 In message: <20090430110739.682cc989.stas@FreeBSD.org> Stanislav Sedov writes: : On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:36:38 +1000 (EST) : Bruce Evans mentioned: : : > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Warner Losh wrote: : > : > > Log: : > > Report the next directory being scanned when a ^T is pressed (or any : > > SIGINFO). Provides some progress report for the impatient. : > : > The impatient should use a tracing utility instead of encrufting : > individual utilities. : > : : On the other hand, using tracing utilities is not the best way to retireve : status information in all cases. Especially if one started the job and then it seems to be "stuck". It is most efficient to know if something is going on, and ^T gives that with a very minimal set of code. Tracing utilities produce way too much output... Warner