Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 10:32:08 -0400 From: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Allan Jude <allanjude@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: EFI GELI support ready for testers Message-ID: <56B11DFF-7E1D-4D93-80E2-6F91F697AB9A@metricspace.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011622350.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra> References: <519CC1FC-84DF-4710-8E62-AF26D8AED2CF@metricspace.net> <20160528083656.GT38613@kib.kiev.ua> <d6b96a6c-4e92-35a5-e78b-cc674b6d2f25@freebsd.org> <20160528172618.GB38613@kib.kiev.ua> <6A9DADE0-B214-424A-BB14-0B0848F0D08D@metricspace.net> <20160529091827.GD38613@kib.kiev.ua> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1606011622350.3503@laptop.wojtek.intra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 1, 2016, at 10:23, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net> wrote: >> >> And why it is simultaneously desirable to add a bunch of code to loader >> to hide this ? > > For me it is nonsense ending with having another copy of kernel as boot loader ;), which will in turn require another normal boot loader to load it ;) What are you talking about? Nobody's added another stage to the boot loader, nor is anyone advocating doing so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?56B11DFF-7E1D-4D93-80E2-6F91F697AB9A>