From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 10 09:51:50 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id C291AE88; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:50 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:50 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r308545 - in head/x11-fonts: . dina
Message-ID: <20121210095150.GK34139@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201212091717.qB9HHYqZ090822@svn.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201212091717.qB9HHYqZ090822@svn.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:51:50 -0000

On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 05:17:34PM +0000, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> New Revision: 308545
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/308545
> 
> +MAINTAINER=	rakuco@FreeBSD.org
> +COMMENT=	A monospace bitmap font, primarily aimed at programmers

It was agreed upon that we do not include leading indefinite article (and
definite, unless it is part of the project name) in COMMENT line.

> +# IANAL, but the license looks close enough to a standard BSD license that
> +# auto-accept and all the other permissions look like reasonable defaults here.
> +LICENSE=	custom
> +LICENSE_NAME=	Custom License
> +LICENSE_FILE=	${WRKSRC}/LICENSE
> +LICENSE_PERMS=	auto-accept dist-mirror dist-sell pkg-mirror pkg-sell

Do you think upstream maintainer can be convinced to switch to standard
license with next release (BSD, MIT, etc.)?

./danfe