From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Oct 17 20:04:53 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id UAA19418
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA19413
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:04:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA26125; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199610180303.UAA26125@rah.star-gate.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: jdw@wwwi.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IP bugs in FreeBSD 2.1.5 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Oct 1996 11:55:26 PDT."
             <199610171855.LAA06293@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 1996 20:03:23 -0700
From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>From The Desk Of Terry Lambert :
> > > > It is a matter of what we can do and the resources that we
> > > > have available -- that is all .
> > > 
> > > No it's not.  It is the difference between an entrepeneurship (16-22
> > > participants, max) and a small business (100-150 participants, max)
> > > and a medium business  (1200-2500 participants, max).
> > > 
> > 
> > I don't think that the above is the case. Clearly, FreeBSD is available
> > for any large corporation to take charget of it.
> 
> This would be topologically equivalent to a "split".

I wouldn't use the word "split" rather and hopefully "friendly takeover"
with a business goal. The closest that I can think of 
that falls into this category is Caldera .


> Hint: Societies are subject to statistical laws, and I'm not stupid.


Societies are also lead 8)

	Amancio