From owner-freebsd-security Mon Jul 23 8:57:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DE937B405; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:57:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@earth.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.4/8.11.2) id f6NFvQb17025; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:57:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200107231557.f6NFvQb17025@earth.backplane.com> To: Garrett Wollman Cc: , Subject: Re: RE: bin/22595: telnetd tricked into using arbitrary peer ip References: <000f01c11315$094851e0$420d640a@HELL> <200107230354.f6N3stj13517@earth.backplane.com> <200107231538.f6NFcZl81468@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org : :< said: : :> All very nice, guys, but not realistic. Only FreeBSD uses an API. : :Erm, no, wrong. : :SVR4 has an API. This API is standardized as a part of the Austin :Group process. : :-GAWollman Fine.. then if you want to get all the third party program authors to use a magic API, be my guest. Could it be, no... it couldn't... all those programs couldn't just not *know* about the 'Austin Group process' could they? That's criminal! Oops, oh well so much for that! Even ssh, about the closest third party program to BSD as there ever was, doesn't use an API call for lastlog. It does for utmp, sort-of, but not for lastlog. Bzzzt. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message