From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jun 15 9:37: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from spirit.jaded.net (shortbus.jaded.net [216.94.132.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AD837BC42; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:36:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@spirit.jaded.net) Received: (from dan@localhost) by spirit.jaded.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA01714; Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:36:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 12:36:54 -0400 From: Dan Moschuk To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: "David O'Brien" , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problem building modules for release. Message-ID: <20000615123654.J1043@spirit.jaded.net> References: <20000615090242.A32679@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000615093140.L18462@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000615093140.L18462@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Thu, Jun 15, 2000 at 09:31:40AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG | > Now that we've had a taste of both ways, I have two questions of people: | > | > 1. Should the symbol be MODULES_WITH_KERNEL or MODULES_WITH_WORLD, (or | > something else)? | > | > 2. Which should be the default? Building modules with world or kernel. | | I haven't see an "oops my modules and kernel are out of sync" mail since | the change. The extra time it takes to build is a bit annoying but very | worth the protection it allows. | | I'd stick with building the modules along with the kernel. I would definately keep it in the kernel build rather than the world build. Yes, it takes a few more minutes building a kernel, but there is always make -DNO_MODULES. -- Dan Moschuk (TFreak!dan@freebsd.org) "Meep meep!" - Roadrunner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message