From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 18:52:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB5010656AD for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4968FC14 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so912853bwz.13 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:52:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=q1/xjy1C46UbjVn26RC5crO7LK8dYm4yrCj9t+X+cxk=; b=QYLGIPcxKb6yllyuJolyXzBdkjlx5BW6NuWG+R6gMlmi78PjzapWmbCf9B/5fq3fzh d1AX/FwmSllMvM5AXAwNt9X/Mc0gTuROHIGtQ5Kto7yG5KQ8BB8G4/gvGURZ6f81oa9z O1lm9ROBH0lYssZ3c+pLQsZdmWZ7edSPupbfM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=I32TuxJww1V0A8DPDV52kgb1ubm8xONLO/CToSs/lqIvwhW/GQhJf2T02O3+X4jXRc JwgPPSLOp+e89Ki6ZGGFdJGwRMeb2HqStRRe//SvP6B8GgMnAYfp/gynAvMXuz9jpeRf HAAWmHvOpzEJcxeN9uiLJv+glZ8e/ktdnOgWM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.127.10 with SMTP id e10mr327873bks.136.1285181523043; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.97.208 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:52:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86aan93fdd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <861v8l6ckx.fsf@gmail.com> <86aan93fdd.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 20:52:02 +0200 Message-ID: From: David DEMELIER To: Anonymous Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: x11/sessreg fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 18:52:04 -0000 2010/9/22 Anonymous : > David DEMELIER writes: > >> I have them in /usr/include/utmpx.h >> >> At configure stage : >> >> checking utmpx.h usability... yes >> checking utmpx.h presence... yes >> checking for utmpx.h... yes >> >> In config.log there is not something strange but if you want to check >> it I attached it. >> >> By the way I'm running 8.1-RELEASE on amd64. > > There is no utmpx.h on 8.1-RELEASE. > Then it's there because I downgraded from -STABLE, then I should remove it safely ? -- Demelier David