From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 1 21:43:11 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7B6D0D
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E109B1722
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:43:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s81LhAaL098137
for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 1 Sep 2014 21:43:10 GMT
(envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 193212] [stage] sysutils/bsdconfig
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:43:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-193212-13-n24dU0O71s@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-193212-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>,
<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 21:43:11 -0000
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193212
John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Issue Resolved |Patch Ready
Resolution|Feature Proposal Rejected |---
Summary|sysutils/bsdconfig |[stage] sysutils/bsdconfig
|[maintainer] STAGE svn diff |
--- Comment #7 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
Daniel, thanks, moving to patch-ready status
Chris,
I believe that you think you understand, but you've continually made the same
gross mistake after I've pointed out the mistake several times with pretty
harsh language, e.g. "the MAN= mistake was frankly astonishing". I made such a
big deal about it that I never expected to see the same mistake again, yet you
made it several times after that.
The most basic checks (which are available to you now), "make check-plist"
would have caught this error. The error didn't get caught, so obviously it
wasn't tested. The only explanation that makes sense is that you never
understood why the "MAN<X>=" definitions were a problem, nor how to fix it, nor
that redports can't detect it.
So I truly believe there is a serious understanding issue underground. Please
try to understand MAN pages fixes and all those "make" checks I listed
previously. There is zero excuse not to do those, and I want to see the
*OUTPUT* of those checks. I don't assume that you did them, I want proof.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.