Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jun 2015 21:54:24 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 200751] net/rtpproxy: Update to 2.0.0
Message-ID:  <bug-200751-13-zt40jeyZ7N@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-200751-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-200751-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200751

--- Comment #3 from Euan Thoms <euan@potensol.com> ---
Thanks Kubilay.

I already did a port portlint -AC and removed all FATAL's only 2 or 3 WARNINGS.
Also, "make check-plist" is OK. I have yet to use Poudriere, so I will need to
invest the time to setup / learn it. Since I have other ports submitted, and
intend become a maintainer.

Normally I will test the port in 8.4, 9.3 and 10.1 the old fashioned way. But
because this port compiles well without any patching and little change to the
Makefile from the current version of the port, I am confident it builds well on
other arch/versions. It's seems it's one of those really well developed C
projects that build cleanly on all POSIX systems.

I have attached the diff file.


# portlint -AC
WARN: /usr/ports/net/rtpproxy/pkg-plist: There are only 4 items in the plist. 
Consider using PLIST_FILES instead of pkg-plist when installing less than 6
items.
WARN: Makefile: no ftp/http mirror in MASTER_SITES for users behind a proxy.
0 fatal errors and 2 warnings found.


# make stage && make check-plist && make stage-qa && make package
====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist)
===> Parsing plist
===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist
===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR
===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist)
====> Running Q/A tests (stage-qa)

Do you want the full output of "make stage && make check-plist && make stage-qa
&& make package"? If so, it is long so I'll have to attach it.

Also, I haven't used it long enough in production yet to comment on the runtime
quality, but I will do soon and report back. It does start up and has been
running for 1-2 full days already, no crashes etc. yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-200751-13-zt40jeyZ7N>