From owner-freebsd-current Thu Feb 7 15:24:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mailb.telia.com (mailb.telia.com [194.22.194.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E6037B41A; Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:24:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix.granlund.nu (h74n2fls32o883.telia.com [217.208.61.74]) by mailb.telia.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g17NOU905485; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:24:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from hatchet ([192.168.0.10]) by phoenix.granlund.nu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g17NOsG26475; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:24:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 00:20:50 +0100 (W. Europe Standard Time) From: Johan Granlund To: Cc: Alfred Perlstein , Joe Kelsey , Subject: Re: gcc3.x issues In-Reply-To: <1013106622.34034.6.camel@revelstoke.panasas.com> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: johan@phoenix.granlund.nu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 Feb 2002, Nat Lanza wrote: > > Surely you see the difference between "That's an interesting idea; can > you generate some patches so we can take a look and see how it works > out?" and "WhereTF is your patch to do this?". > > One provides an opportunity for users to contribute, and the other is a > snarling, rude dismissal that really doesn't do very much to encourage > people to stick around and help out. I humbly have to agree that was the way it sounded to me. Im hoping that it was not meant that way, but that was howe it sounded. /Johan > > > --nat > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message