Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 12:07:29 +0300 From: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Cc: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r219680 - in head/bin: ln rm test Message-ID: <AANLkTi=A4dFjMh84TJ76vE7EPJro6UfdPSzd5t6ycr7w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110315235419.GA45188@freebsd.org> References: <201103152222.p2FMMB8O061154@svn.freebsd.org> <20110315235419.GA45188@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 March 2011 02:54, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tue Mar 15 11, Jilles Tjoelker wrote: >> Author: jilles >> Date: Tue Mar 15 22:22:11 2011 >> New Revision: 219680 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219680 >> >> Log: >> =A0 bin: Prefer strrchr() to rindex(). > > shouldn't the rindex(3) manual contain a note regarding it's depricated n= ature > and the fact that strchr(3) is preferred? > Indeed, both index(3) and rindex(3) are marked legacy in POSIX -2004, and are cut from -2008 edition. --=20 wbr, pluknet
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTi=A4dFjMh84TJ76vE7EPJro6UfdPSzd5t6ycr7w>