Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 12:23:40 -0400 From: Fbsd8 <fbsd8@a1poweruser.com> To: andrey gavryushov <agavryushov@inbox.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Housing solution based on FreeBSD + ZFS + Jails Message-ID: <536BAF8C.9070905@a1poweruser.com> In-Reply-To: <1399558442.594011546@f256.i.mail.ru> References: <1399558442.594011546@f256.i.mail.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
andrey gavryushov wrote: > On Wednesday 07 May 2014 17:21:00 bsd@todoo.biz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We are currently reviewing solutions available in order to create a si= mple >> and robust hosting solution for our clients. >> >> After reviewing various =C2=AB panel =C2=BB type of solution (not so r= obust at the >> level of the , we were wondering if anyone had already developed somet= hing >> which would incorporate (partially or totally) the following aspects : >> >> >> 1. strong quota management (ideally based on ZFS) >> >> 2. secure user access to data (FTP/SFTP) - authentication (LDAP ? or D= B >> based) >> >> 3. template based jail (in order to provide pre-configured environment= to >> clients) =E2=80=94 might include classic environment such as PHP + MyS= QL (and all >> classic Drupal, Wordpress, =E2=80=A6) or other types of environment. >> >> 4. API based on a correctly described language (XML ? SOAP, =E2=80=A6)= in order to >> pilot that from our existing front end or backend (J2EE based) >> >> >> I have two skilled engineers which will work on this project for coupl= e of >> months=E2=80=A6 If things have only been partially developed, It might= be >> interesting to further discuss=E2=80=A6 >> >=20 > You plan to develop as o pensource or for yourself ? If the second , I = would=20 > also be interesting as planning to do something similar . > Is the most difficult question in my mind is the interaction between > frontend and backend and I have not seen anything work on this topic . > And yes, looks like ezjail can be used as a backend here. >=20 When I tried running ezjail on release 10.0 it was dead in the water.=20 Its not updated to use native jail(8) jail.conf method yet. Works fine=20 on 9.x and older system.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?536BAF8C.9070905>