From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jun 2 07:14:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-chat Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id HAA20464 for chat-outgoing; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hda (ip57-max1-fitch.zipnet.net [199.232.245.57]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA20459 for ; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 07:14:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dufault@localhost) by hda (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA11494; Sun, 2 Jun 1996 10:15:46 -0400 From: Peter Dufault Message-Id: <199606021415.KAA11494@hda> Subject: Re: Breaking ffs - speed enhancement? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Sun, 2 Jun 1996 10:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Cc: terry@lambert.org, chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199606012259.PAA22318@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Jun 1, 96 03:59:16 pm Reply-to: hdalog@zipnet.net X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Please quit addressing this as if it were anything other than a > kernel space issue. Should I follow up with commentary on indentation styles and big company lack of risk taking instead? What can be done portably in the kernel (and if it can be done portably) is governed by the user space issues. -- Peter Dufault Real-Time Machine Control and Simulation HD Associates, Inc. Voice: 508 433 6936 dufault@hda.com Fax: 508 433 5267