From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Aug 21 0:25:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from bayer2.bayer-ag.de (bayer2.bayer-ag.de [194.120.191.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6782A37B424 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 00:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BYE473.BAYER-AG.DE (bye473.bayer-ag.com) by bayer2.bayer-ag.de with SMTP id JAA18040 (SMTP Gateway 4.2 for ); Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:25:02 +0200 Received: by BYE473.BAYER-AG.DE (Soft-Switch LMS 3.2) with snapi via MT0044 id 0006800029488466; Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:24:56 +0200 From: andreas.klemm.ak@bayer-ag.de To: " - *ticso@cicely5.cicely.de" Cc: " - *apsfilter-doc@apsfilter.org" , " - *freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org" , " - *bernd@apsfilter.org" Subject: Antwort: Re: jade problems Message-Id: <0006800029488466000002L062*@MHS> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 09:24:56 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Bernd, there has also been a problem during runtime in former release of the jade port see here: http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/textproc/jade/Makefile.diff?r1=1.25& r2=1.26 the previous version of jade ports Makefile tells: .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == "alpha" BROKEN= nsgmls coredumps in static constructors .endif Could perhaps somebody from the freebsd-alpha list confirm if or if not the FreeBSD docu can be "compiled" using jade without coredumps or not ?! BTW, sorry for this excellent mailer (Lotus notes) Andreas /// ticso@cicely5.cicely.de on 21.08.2000 07:43:10 An: Andreas Klemm/EXQEJ/CH/DE/BAYER@BAYERNOTES, bernd@apsfilter.org@INTERNET Kopie: Thema: Re: jade problems On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 07:27:58AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > X-Dis claimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular > > What about upgrading the machine to FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE ? I don't like the idea because our uptime is already 29 days ;) > Then we could be more precise on saying, the last recent > -STABLE release has problems with compiling and running jade... > > On the other hand we would have a good chance to get rid of the > error, because the BROKEN flag has been deleted for jade... > > This might be the case because the bugs have been fixed in > 4.1-STABLE ... What I understood is that the fixed bug was that jade did not even compile. And that the port was fixed not the operating system. Well we are using the latest port - and we can type cvs update in the portsdir wheneven we need. I don't asume there are relevant changes in STABLE since - but I can test this on my home system with a more or less recent current. -- B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de ticso@cicely.de Usergroup info@cosmo-project.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message