Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 05:59:13 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r522202 - in head/audio: . libaudec libaudec/files Message-ID: <20200106055913.GA44473@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20200106055041.lggeghkulpm32g3w@ivaldir.net> References: <202001060451.0064pfdH044874@repo.freebsd.org> <20200106052719.5oqlohpaadoua3hp@ivaldir.net> <181b91d7-f2dc-750b-a65c-840241aef5b6@rawbw.com> <20200106055041.lggeghkulpm32g3w@ivaldir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 06:50:41AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 09:42:23PM -0800, Yuri wrote: > > On 2020-01-05 21:27, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > It is also a good practice to have a soname for shared library in > > > general. (A soname which is not the name of the .so file itself) > > > > I know, but they didn't assign a soname. You might want to see r423146 as an example[1]. > It is up to the committer to ensure what is packaged is properly packaged, > so if upstream does not provide a SONAME, you should patch the build > system to provide one before adding to the ports tree. Did we ever document this in the PHB? I've found the link above in the 2016 discussion[2] which says that back in those time it had no match for SONAME, had this changed since then? ./danfe [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=423146 [2] https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2016-October/105114.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200106055913.GA44473>