From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 10 00:52:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03203106564A for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lsantagostini@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C18D8FC12 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb22 with SMTP id 22so97659wwb.31 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:52:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=r0jPzbbgbAcUS8dzGs8AE7OyrrA4aIMABJ0v3jUTcjw=; b=KjNV6143kRB4SUczWc4QC9h7bpPWbE+SvXsLybX1tvyYMh01cJnvhcnStwed55HKud f/sRyEB37umWcnbec8MgZd5Qcy285Vdw93DXYolfH3VMjgCdzIhhP917fJh4Uhlll2FX iEFxIE44kUGzl+jRByeiXWPuvivkpnav/kcYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Cn/VbPf8mI5KcuOTEcx+eL0FU/jv02piRs1AD8LHjDRAUsWI26ICCyle87swwKfyIQ GZQWNUlvKjgyuWUAHovZfngARQSu+uEEPuQ8VcMDLtnI/OCUwBw7lHOR9rEcNCdnwgu/ ymmxyQOM1tZ1bcaqRuERt9fnDJVHHCQPXoD2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.78.143 with SMTP id g15mr3933514wee.31.1289350339232; Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:52:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.35.2 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Nov 2010 16:52:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <10928_1289348362_4CD9E50A_10928_2705_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C1C@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <20407_1289335707_4CD9B39B_20407_70_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C0F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <1065_1289336761_4CD9B7B9_1065_274_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C11@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <10928_1289348362_4CD9E50A_10928_2705_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C1C@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 21:52:19 -0300 Message-ID: From: Leonardo Santagostini To: Gary Gatten Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Nathan Vidican , bluethundr , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 00:52:22 -0000 Hello All, in a few moments i will start making some test with the suggestions you give me. I will tell you how things are going. Thanks all for reply! Yours, Leonardo Santagostini 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten > Seems out of scope to OP, but cool info nonetheless. I'd like to get my > web team to ditch a couple ISA servers for this, but sadly I doubt they > will... > > -----Original Message----- > From: bluethundr [mailto:bluethundr@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 5:42 PM > To: Gary Gatten > Cc: Leonardo Santagostini; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question > > This might be worth looking into as well! > > It's an open source load balancer that was originally developed by > yahoo and released into the open source community. It is now a part of > the Apache project: > > http://trafficserver.apache.org/ > > > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Gary Gatten wrote: > > If three different providers, then to my knowledge you are SOL - mlppp is > not an option - unless someone here knows something I don't - which is 100% > likely :) > > > > Now, that said you can configure your routing to split the traffic > amongst different connections - so traffic to/from certain hosts use > connection A, other hosts use B, etc. You can even get fancy and route > based on application and host if you wish. Ci$co calls this Policy Based > Routing. I'm not sure if FBSD or another package such as pf allows similar > functionality. My guess would be yes - but I don't know anything about > that. > > > > As for "bonding" or aggregating your connections to appear as a single > one - not an option AFAIK. > > > > G > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Leonardo Santagostini [mailto:lsantagostini@gmail.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 2:52 PM > > To: Gary Gatten > > Cc: Chuck Swiger; Nathan Vidican; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Re: Multiple tun loadbalancing question > > > > Hello all, > > > > Im using 3 different providers all from Argentina, Clora, Movistar and > Personal. > > > > Thank you > > Leonardo Santagostini > > > > 2010/11/9 Gary Gatten > > > > > > > Also, may be obvious to point out, but all (3) connections "must" be from > the same provider. In the lab you could MAYBE get a stable/usable > connection from multiple providers (with just ppp or 'x' encap) by splitting > the requests on the egress side - but it's highly unlikely in the real > world. In most cases the traffic load is asymmetrical and heavily biased > towards ingress traffic, so even if you could get it to "work" - it wouldn't > provide much benefit. > > > > Just curious, what provider are you using? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> >
> > "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > > return email and delete this email from your system." > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > -- > Here's my RSA Public key: > gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 5A4873A9 > > Share and enjoy!! > > > > > > >
>
> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > >