Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Nov 2004 12:17:02 +0200
From:      Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mntopts.h mount.8 mount.csrc/sbin/mount_std mount_std.8
Message-ID:  <41AC489E.7050108@DougBarton.net>
In-Reply-To: <20041130090553.GA691@ip.net.ua>
References:  <200411290935.iAT9Z17L087708@repoman.freebsd.org> <41AC3332.7040809@DougBarton.net> <20041130090553.GA691@ip.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 10:45:38AM +0200, Doug Barton wrote:
> 
>>Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>
>>>ru          2004-11-29 09:35:01 UTC
>>>
>>>  FreeBSD src repository
>>>
>>>  Modified files:
>>>    sbin/mount           mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c 
>>>    sbin/mount_std       mount_std.8 
>>>  Log:
>>>  Fix the mount(8) status reporting, now that MNT_NODEV is a no-op (zero).
>>>  
>>>  Asked to commit by:     phk
>>>  
>>>  Revision  Changes    Path
>>>  1.23      +0 -2      src/sbin/mount/mntopts.h
>>>  1.69      +1 -7      src/sbin/mount/mount.8
>>>  1.67      +0 -2      src/sbin/mount/mount.c
>>>  1.23      +1 -2      src/sbin/mount_std/mount_std.8
>>>
>>>http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mntopts.h.diff?&r1=1.22&r2=1.23&f=h
>>>http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mount.8.diff?&r1=1.68&r2=1.69&f=h
>>>http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount/mount.c.diff?&r1=1.66&r2=1.67&f=h
>>>http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sbin/mount_std/mount_std.8.diff?&r1=1.22&r2=1.23&f=h
>>
>>FYI, this commit seems to have broken my line in fstab which has worked for
>>a long time:
>>
>>md                      /tmp    mfs     rw,-s16m,noatime,nosuid,nodev 2 0
>>
>>Is it useful for the nodev option to cause a hard failure here? Note, I'm
>>not arguing against either change, just pointing out a side effect.
>>
> 
> There's no longer a "nodev" option, please ask Poul-Henning for details.  ;)

Yes, I understand the mechanics, I'm just curious if you think that this
should result in a fatal error. It sounds like you think that the answer to
that is yes, which if that is the correct answer I'm fine with that.

Doug


-- 

	If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41AC489E.7050108>