From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 18 01:25:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B2B1065679 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outW.internet-mail-service.net (outw.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966FD8FC0A for ; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5070CDAD3E; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:25:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e X-Client-Authorized: MaGic Cook1e Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (unknown [67.100.89.137]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798902D6017; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ADA6E79.2080401@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 18:25:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= References: <4ACE6D84.3000209@gmail.com> <4ACE833A.3030506@uffner.com> <4ACE9DFD.3010207@gmail.com> <200910131644.04358.john@baldwin.cx> <86ljja3ud5.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86ljja3ud5.fsf@ds4.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Antony Mawer , John Baldwin , David Ehrmann , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.0rc1 not recognizing partitions on EPIA SN X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:25:11 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Antony Mawer writes: >> Am I correct in reading this as saying that -any- system which was >> setup as dangerously dedicated will be unbootable under 8.0, and the >> only way to fix is to basically repartition and reinstall...? If so >> ... !!! > > You brought it upon yourself by setting it up that way in the first > place. It's called *dangerously* dedicated for a reason. I coined that expression back in 92 because it only worked because the bsdlabel also included a dummy fdisk block, which pointed to itself. > > DES