From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 14:24:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C14916A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (dsl390.iae.nl [212.61.63.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CB143D49 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:24:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from dual (dual [212.61.27.71]) by freebee.digiware.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i4DLKtLE073554; Thu, 13 May 2004 23:20:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Message-ID: <02f301c43930$3fb2ea80$471b3dd4@dual> From: "Willem Jan Withagen" To: "Darryl Okahata" References: <200405132100.OAA02889@mina.soco.agilent.com> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 23:21:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing on large disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:24:10 -0000 From: "Darryl Okahata" > "Willem Jan Withagen" wrote: > > > After several reinstalls I've come to the conclusion that installing > > i386 and amd64 in 50G partitions does not work. > > See the "-o packet" option of boot0cfg: > > -o options > A comma-separated string of any of the following options may be > specified (with ``no'' prepended as necessary): > > packet Use the disk packet (BIOS Int 0x13 extensions) interface, > as as opposed to the legacy (CHS) interface, when doing > disk I/O. This allows booting above cylinder 1023, but > requires specific BIOS support. The default is > `nopacket'. > Although I see your point, I need/want a selector which understands the fact that the slice on which the bootcode is is at the far, far end of the disk. ASnd from what I gather, this will just replace the selector code which normally lives in the MBR??? --WjW