From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 14 08:48:54 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478DC16A468 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAECD13C44B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asmrookie@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id u2so656394uge for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:48:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=F7rGiPAxffEOPVH1g4p6xyt/2h8PmcN90MAI+jj/DDiftEwdXgv2JFrLzoT39RB+q3j+M49PPpZD2h3tXeN0L6GVGVPkg3lCJ9lRaD/84/fySe4ZsEj+IkIu9udzPyCbaRnEOZyHXtV5Q76VjF/V389UROO6/mFf61/fG1OaNLA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=lLOpVWThZK9SinJXn9EfEWD7VGou5LRmu6W5x4h11odLBUiZvOMrLOBBmDpOT8SbtNI/WA/ALp92k91wQ4eAk3kM18osDL9+PmWbdu078CCoXhggmcCITtDOEhzkYZ4E5MQjYMLo42FoWADXcy7S6MkjV22itqLxLcqiNJB4LlM= Received: by 10.82.116.15 with SMTP id o15mr2904324buc.1181810931852; Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?172.31.5.25? ( [89.97.252.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d24sm4338893nfh.2007.06.14.01.48.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 14 Jun 2007 01:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <467100D9.7040600@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:48:25 +0200 From: Attilio Rao User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060526) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Randall Stewart References: <46706E63.1080906@cisco.com> <20070614022510.GA61989@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4670B1A0.4070706@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <4670B1A0.4070706@cisco.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Attilio Rao Cc: current@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: KTR and SCTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: attilio@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 08:48:54 -0000 Randall Stewart wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 06:23:31PM -0400, Randall Stewart wrote: >> >>> All: >>> >>> I am in the process of converting all the logging that >>> SCTP does to use the KTR sub-system. This will fit >>> nicely.. I still need to do some things to make it >>> so I can pull out the logs and make pretty charts and >>> graphs (in SCTP its used for debugging but also exploring >>> how CC and other niceties works).. >>> >>> But I was wondering.. would anyone mind if I took >>> KTR_SPARE2 >>> >>> and made it: >>> >>> KTR_SCTP_SUBSYS >>> >>> I have a huge amount of tracing under SCTP now.. so >>> many I am setting in a seperate mask set to enable/disable >>> various pieces of it.. So I was thinking it would >>> warrent a sub-system of its own :-D >>> >>> Any objections? If not I will change it :-D >> >> >> Yeah, we really do need to keep those spare fields for local use. >> >> Kris >> > Ok.. so I will just use > > KTR_SPARE2 KTR_SCTP would not be more appropriate? Attilio