From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 15 00:29:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307E41065672 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C218FC0A for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:29:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ngoq7-0001L5-Tv for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:29:27 +0100 Received: from 78-1-161-12.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.161.12]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:29:27 +0100 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-161-12.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:29:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 01:29:04 +0100 Lines: 65 Message-ID: References: <20100214165027.3c4f6b75@scorpio.seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-161-12.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090612) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Question about Freebsd 7.2 and Zend framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:29:31 -0000 Samuel Mart=C3=ADn Moro wrote: > It's not officialy supported, but it still works. > You have to link some libraries to give them their freebsd 6.2 names. >=20 > I had to do it for the servers we sell at work. > It works perfectly. I'm glad it works, and it is not surprising. It would be easier for a=20 company to support FreeBSD with its stable ABI across minor releases=20 (and a great deal of userland stability even across major ones) than=20 support the myriad of Linuxes out there. > On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Ivan Voras wrote= : >=20 >> Jerry wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:51:48 +0100 >>> Ivan Voras articulated: >>> >>> Robert wrote: >>>>> Hello >>>>> >>>>> I have zend framework websites and I was wondering if they work >>>>> well with Freebsd7.2? >>>>> >>>>> Because I hear bad thing about that. Can you tell me about that >>>>> please? >>>>> >>>> Zend Framework is PHP? PHP works on FreeBSD, Zend Framework will als= o >>>> work. Unless you give more specific questions, you won't get more sp= ecific >>>> answers :) >>>> >>> From the Zend web site: >>> >>> Zend does not plan any more releases for FreeBSD. We have end of life= d >>> all of our FreeBSD product line due to lack of demand. >>> >>> >>> For further details, see the full text: >>> >>> http://forums.zend.com/viewtopic.php?f=3D57&t=3D2412 >>> >> Zend Optimizer is of course a different thing, and yes, it is disconti= nued >> for FreeBSD. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= =2Eorg" >=20