Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 21:14:06 -0400 From: Steve Wills <swills@FreeBSD.org> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>, ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Ruby 1.9 as default Message-ID: <4FCEAEDE.8060707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20120605110002.589f1071.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <4FC96D45.8080904@FreeBSD.org> <20120601193059.af9201da.stas@FreeBSD.org> <4FCD51E4.4030309@FreeBSD.org> <20120605085202.GI85127@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <07758721-BD54-4732-9B17-83D4CCCF55E0@freebsd.org> <def1973e5aaac34b7e3977ddc1427a6f.squirrel@mouf.net> <20120605110002.589f1071.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/05/12 14:00, Stanislav Sedov wrote: > You usually cannot dlopen the object linked agains pthread from a > non-pthreaded object. Or it is used to be that way. My understanding is that you can now, IFF your non-threaded object is built with -pthread. > Exec should work > fine, I don't see how this can be an issue. Good point. >> >> Perhaps we need to build ruby with -pthread? >> > > Of course, we already do. Both of them. > Ah, right, I realized this just after I hit send, sorry, need to have my coffee before sending email. :) >From what I saw in your other messages, it sounds like this may be specific to the use of mono. Or can you reproduce with another program? Thanks, Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FCEAEDE.8060707>