From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 26 11:25:52 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742C216A404 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE77A13C494 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0QBPAVf040484; Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:25:11 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 09:24:58 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <8a20e5000701240903q35b89e14k1ab977df62411784@mail.gmail.com> <200701250828.50540.joao@matik.com.br> <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> In-Reply-To: <87ac074537.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200701260924.59674.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Loosing spam fight X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:25:52 -0000 On Thursday 25 January 2007 11:18, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > JoaoBR writes: > > all this methods are certainly useless, stay calm ok > > I fully sympathize with your need to rant, but in this context most of > what you say is really quite beside the point. Please read what the > material at the links provided actually says. > the articles you linked show how to implement pf like I said, for my understandings firewall implemention for spam fighting = is=20 wrong because you reject the message unless you are the man of a corporate network you do have *NO* right to dec= ide=20 which message your users receive or not. May be some *WANT* viagra offers a= nd=20 others *WANT* a bigger penis so the only correct decision is to filter spam and put it into a spam folde= r=20 where the user can review it and decide by his own if want it or not but may be, to change your opinion, you need to loose a case being=20 responsible for some having a small penis and pay him his losses hihihihi,= =20 100k/inch or something hihihi laugh with me and have a good day :) =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br