From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 28 11:40:23 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0C31065671;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:40:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5346B8FC18;
	Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:40:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <47C69DA4.5000209@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:40:20 +0100
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Macintosh/20080213)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marko Zec <zec@icir.org>
References: <47C39948.3080907@elischer.org> <47C494B5.2040306@elischer.org>
	<47C49FAA.1020605@FreeBSD.org> <200802280343.57576.zec@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <200802280343.57576.zec@icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marko Zec <zec@freebsd.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>,
	Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>,
	FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: warning of pending commit attempt.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:40:23 -0000

Marko Zec wrote:

> OK first my appologies to everybody for being late in jumping into this 
> thread...  I'll attempt to address a few questions rised so far in a 
> random order, but SMP scalability definitely tops the list...

Thanks, very informative!

Kris