Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:50:50 +0100 From: Ceri <ceri@techsupport.co.uk> To: Neil Darlow <neil@darlow.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why, this is new (and BAD, BAD, BAD!!) ... Message-ID: <20010911155050.A17392@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20010911154213.A22243@router.darlow.co.uk>; from neil@darlow.co.uk on Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:42:13PM %2B0100 References: <20010911154213.A22243@router.darlow.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 03:42:13PM +0100, Neil Darlow said:
> Hi Ceri,
>
> > My reply address is perfectly valid.
>
> Your Reply To: address isn't the issue. Unless the envelope is
> rewritten to remove the unresolvable hostname from the sender address
> information, remote mailers will complain.
>
> It is quite normal to strip-off the hostname for non-resolvable hosts
> e.g. I have a host ideal.darlow.co.uk on my private network which my
> local mailer config rewrites as sender@darlow.co.uk.
I know. I already do this.
That's my point.
[ceri@cartman ceri]$ exim -brw ceri@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
sender: ceri@techsupport.co.uk
from: ceri@techsupport.co.uk
to: ceri@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
cc: ceri@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
bcc: ceri@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
reply-to: ceri@techsupport.co.uk
env-from: ceri@techsupport.co.uk
env-to: ceri@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk
Ceri
--
Your local RFC Nazi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010911155050.A17392>