From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 21 15:22:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5F4C98; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (av-tac-rtp.cisco.com [64.102.19.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624A138D; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:22:01 +0000 (UTC) X-TACSUNS: Virus Scanned Received: from rooster.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by av-tac-rtp.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6LFM1Pg001235; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:22:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rtp-jclarke-8916.cisco.com (rtp-jclarke-8916.cisco.com [10.117.46.167]) by rooster.cisco.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6LFLwcW001248; Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:21:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <51EBFC97.6000504@marcuscom.com> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 11:21:59 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: Mutexes and error checking References: <51E71D4F.5030502@marcuscom.com> <51E8061B.60906@marcuscom.com> <51EB5EC4.6050802@marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Koop Mast , freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:22:02 -0000 On 7/21/13 11:15 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >> On 7/19/13 1:55 AM, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Daniel Eischen wrote: >>> >>> Ugh! I misread the problem when I tried to recreate it and >>> test it on Solaris, so forget that last email. >>> >>> It seems Solaris behaves like Linux with PTHREAD_MUTEX_NORMAL >>> and _unlocking_ mutexes owned by other threads (dead or not). >>> Solaris only returns EPERM for PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK >>> mutexes. >> >> Given that, should we do the same? > > I'm testing a patch. Give me a couple of days to get > some more cycles. > Thanks! Joe -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc