Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:06:47 +0100 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Tim Bishop <tim-lists@bishnet.net> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: ports/58260: New Port: print/lilypond-devel Message-ID: <3FB81F27.6000502@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20031117003608.GA5555@carrick.bishnet.net> References: <20031019233208.80051.qmail@mail.frobs.net> <20031116191222.GA30181@mail.webmonster.de> <20031116214023.GA16310@xor.obsecurity.org> <3FB80FB3.5090205@ciam.ru> <20031117001330.GA18934@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031117003608.GA5555@carrick.bishnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tim Bishop wrote: > I wonder what the view of "portrookies" is amongst the committers? > > Is it a good thing? Will it help or hinder getting new ports into the main > ports tree? Only time will tell - it depends what people make out of it. As such it is only a CVS repository, which can't be good or evil by itself. It is far too early to answer questions like that. But since pkgsrc-wip is fairly popular in NetBSD I hope it will grow to be a A Good Thing(tm).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB81F27.6000502>