From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 18:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0B516A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE21B43D41 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5LIJkkP049157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i5LIJk93049154; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Scott Mitchell In-Reply-To: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: /bin/ls -t and nanoseconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:07 -0000 < said: > Does POSIX have anything to say about whether or not '/bin/ls -t' should > pay attention to the nanoseconds part of the file timestamps? POSIX doesn't have anything to say about file timestamps having nanoseconds parts. -GAWollman