From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Dec 3 19:09:15 1996 Return-Path: owner-isp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id TAA01773 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 19:09:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.harborcom.net (root@ns2.harborcom.net [206.158.4.4]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA01763 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 19:09:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from swoosh.dunn.org (swoosh.dunn.org [206.158.7.243]) by ns2.harborcom.net (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id WAA14557; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 22:09:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 22:04:49 -0500 () From: Bradley Dunn To: John Capo cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugh...long usernames In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: bradley@harborcom.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 3 Dec 1996, John Capo wrote: > /usr/src/include/protocols/rwhod.h: char out_name[8]; /* user id */ This is the same as in BSD/OS. I think changing this would maybe break rwho? > /usr/include/stdio.h:#define L_cuserid 9 /* size for cuserid(); UT_NAMESIZE + 1 */ In BSD/OS this is UT_NAMESIZE (ie 16). Anyone know why the +1? -BD