From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 08:34:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01A1E106564A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1848FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:34:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaac13 with SMTP id c13so132337eaa.13 for ; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:34:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=NkJOrppklsH9IHx7ZYJNvTByLBXTbXKfZO8t6TFAUPI=; b=kyIvdOZXGyMzMmFlQwRpdFlmMuYG38Zp5/cZrj+5S+8Kr+L2/7kVNwZlCPuapJx9Cy 8GlgGCtTARpAIGX4Gxy8dYVztR+evRT8kyNzfiXNy50PdAzPh/G+R73jCY8chlqHd9ZN 5zicKETB6n3XgXa8iz5Sz+1uNPFGwabLYmYG5ow6mDLj2EiY/NG7CiDFG5MeIHN5yzcm nwrc/EphAZivVVAkpAkWqkFOkvQJfmDIth9JXCMhSdTGUyUn7QiiwNP0tYlZVvp8M4Zk qmtM09feZKhQhTzGFj8lIewhIPyMwJLDdR0uZnoDPvFhcK4GBoMeL3eczShHRky/ugdI zM5g== Received: by 10.14.53.74 with SMTP id f50mr907380eec.99.1338539659464; Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m5sm4246992eeh.17.2012.06.01.01.34.18 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jun 2012 01:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FC87E89.3050609@my.gd> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:34:17 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4FC873F2.5030102@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4FC873F2.5030102@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn7xC/Ycu7Hfx0tthMp6TybNK6DrXlj1pO2VzHtqufWA1e0jhgzFXurNFqjq2fRr2kppi7k Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports patch count X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:34:44 -0000 On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Hiya > > I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen > on the FreeBSD ports. > > To show you what I mean. > > [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update; > pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install > auditfile.tbz 100% of 77 kB 6570 Bps > 00m00s > New database installed. > 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 9 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from geodns-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Thu May 31 19:58:31 SAST 2012 to Fri Jun 1 08:51:05 SAST > 2012. > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > Fetching 4180 patches.....10....20....30....40.... > > 4180 patches really !!! > > I run the above command almost everyday, so the most I have ever really > seen is 300 - 400 patches. But 4180 has got me attention. > > Thanks > Brent I may be mistaken but I would guess it has to do with the vulnerabilities addressed in OpenSSL in the 30/05/2012 update. I'm assuming authors have bumped their ports' revision numbers to force a rebuild, using the patched openssl lib.