Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 10:34:17 +0200 From: Damien Fleuriot <ml@my.gd> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports patch count Message-ID: <4FC87E89.3050609@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4FC873F2.5030102@gmail.com> References: <4FC873F2.5030102@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/1/12 9:49 AM, Brent Clark wrote: > Hiya > > I would just like to ask / know. Did anything weird or wonderful happen > on the FreeBSD ports. > > To show you what I mean. > > [root@torry /usr/home/bclark]# portaudit -F -a; portsnap fetch update; > pkg_version -vIL=; freebsd-update fetch install > auditfile.tbz 100% of 77 kB 6570 Bps > 00m00s > New database installed. > 0 problem(s) in your installed packages found. > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 9 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from geodns-1.portsnap.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching snapshot metadata... done. > Updating from Thu May 31 19:58:31 SAST 2012 to Fri Jun 1 08:51:05 SAST > 2012. > Fetching 4 metadata patches... done. > Applying metadata patches... done. > Fetching 0 metadata files... done. > Fetching 4180 patches.....10....20....30....40.... > > 4180 patches really !!! > > I run the above command almost everyday, so the most I have ever really > seen is 300 - 400 patches. But 4180 has got me attention. > > Thanks > Brent I may be mistaken but I would guess it has to do with the vulnerabilities addressed in OpenSSL in the 30/05/2012 update. I'm assuming authors have bumped their ports' revision numbers to force a rebuild, using the patched openssl lib.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4FC87E89.3050609>