From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Jul 19  0:52:16 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530131507D
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 00:52:13 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA71620;
	Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:50:16 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net>
Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Determining the return address
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990718150947.14320h-100000@cygnus.rush.net>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 19 Jul 1999 09:50:16 +0200
In-Reply-To: Alfred Perlstein's message of "Sun, 18 Jul 1999 15:12:19 -0500 (EST)"
Message-ID: <xzppv1pm62v.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 13
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> writes:
> On 18 Jul 1999, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > Hmm, I ended up using a global variable which I increment at the
> > beginning of the signal handler, and decrement at the end.
> As long as you make sure the code won't have multiple access
> that would work.

Signal handlers having multiple accesses? When did you last see that
happen?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message