From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 03:20:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6571065746 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB66E8FC08 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1P3KDbd016731; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:20:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p1P3KDIZ016728; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:20:13 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:20:13 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "Edwin L. Culp W." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110224102357.15af921c@scorpio> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-1794821399-1298603046=:16324" Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:20:13 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: HAL's demise X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 03:20:15 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-1794821399-1298603046=:16324 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: > 2011/2/24 Warren Block : >> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote: >> >>> Is FreeBSD now "HAL" free or is it still a requirement? I still have it >>> activated via "/etc/rc.conf" If it is not needed, I would be happy to >>> remove the entry. >> >> It's not a requirement.  You can build xorg-server without it, and there are >> other mechanisms available to provide at least some of the same >> functionality in FreeBSD.  For example, using devd to detect hot-plugged USB >> devices.  There isn't yet a complete replacement like Linux's udev, though. > > Sounded like a good idea to me but ;) > > pkg_deinstall hal-0.5.14_12 > ---> Deinstalling 'hal-0.5.14_12' > pkg_delete: package 'hal-0.5.14_12' is required by these other packages > and may not be deinstalled: Well, actually I wasn't thinking of anything but xorg and device detection. The newest xfce removed support for hal. Maybe GNOME and KDE are in the process of doing the same. ---902635197-1794821399-1298603046=:16324--