From owner-freebsd-hubs Mon Apr 16 18:31:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1504B37B43C for ; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:31:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA02175; Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:31:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2001 21:31:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200104170131.VAA02175@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Milo Hyson" Cc: "Wes Kurdziolek" , "Ely Levy" , Subject: RE: New freebsd mirror In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > Just one client connection brought the CPU load up to about 12%. I figure it > must be something to do with the Modula-3 implementation Nope. The difference is that CVSUP is designed to trade CPU time for network utilization. There are lots of checksums and whatnot going on under the hood in order to prevent unnecessary retransmission of whole files. If you were running an rsync server, you'd see similar results for similar reasons. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message